My weblog work journal. »Archives »Links
Yesterday over lunch, I ran home, grabbed the bike and hit the trail. I’m still a bit out of sorts coming off of a vacation, especially one where I rode a bike almost everyday. I thought getting back to something I enjoyed over my vacation might help me focus a bit.
After my hands started to go asleep on the flat bar, I started to look at all the other bikes going the other direction. Treks, Specializeds, Giants, even a LeMond all zoomed by me in the heat; their riders probably looking for the same thing I was. The LeMond got me thinking about Trek, since they own the brand. There is a large group of bike technicians who bemoan the Trek brand because they bought up many of the smaller companies. It is kind of like the Starbucks thing, you know? Everyone hates Starbucks. However, Trek, like Starbucks, started out as a very small company and grew, which is the dream of every American business (if not the ultimate goal). I don’t know about Trek, but in the case of Starbucks, I’ve read articles about how employees really like working there (mostly) because of their benefits and incentive programs, and that local coffee shops that have a Starbucks move in near their location actually do better business than before the Starbucks “invasion.” Is it bad, then?
Then I remembered that Trek was based in Waterloo, Wisconsin – near where I was riding on vacation anyway. I think they make good bikes, but I think there are many companies that make good bikes – it isn’t really rocket science over 100 years of experimentation and innovation.
Later, thoroughly bushed from riding (16 miles in 55 minutes in 94 degrees), I checked out the Rivendell website for the first time. I’ve heard of Rivendell bikes before, but I haven’t even ever seen a photo of one before yesterday. Rivendell sells itself as a bike boutique, focusing on craftsmanship and classically reliable parts and products. I obviously could relate in any number of ways. In fact, they have this wonderful article on the death (and rebirth?) of craftsmanship that is well worth your time to read, especially the part on technology and craftsmanship holding hands.
However, the article also made me sad – in many things, I am a craftsman that is starting to feel antiquated. I see the portfolios that come across my desk of new students looking for a design job, and I know that none of them know who Josef Muller-Brockmann is, nor have they ever had to draw a perfect .075 Pica high line with a Rapidograph. I’ve embraced technology with open arms, but I enjoy its benefits because I know the old ways – none of these newly-minted designers do (I’m sure there are a few out there). But gosh darn it, they know how to use programs! The desktop revolution made potential designers out of everyone, you know?
I got over it by looking at an Atlantis... what a bike! I’ll be riding one of those sometime in the future, with the classic Brooks leather seat and a merino jersey with my old Mercatone Uno hat. The classics never get old.
I’m with you…sort of. My design and typography program was extensive and intense. We had to hand draw type, serifs and all, and make it look as it should. We had to use Letraset to kern and lead. And I honestly think that it was pointless.
I love type. I have books on typography on my bookshelves. I think that design IS type. I can even spend hours kerning, but I did pretty bad at the beginning of my typography class because I knew that I would never have to draw a perfect sentance in Frutiger by hand. The whole first part of the semester was in my opinion a waste of time.
I understand your point about appreciating the craft, but just because you use different tools, it doesn’t necessarily make you less of a craftsman. I mean, it’s not like they taught us how to chisel type into marble. That’s how they did it in Rome 2,000 years ago, so shouldn’t we learn that as well? No, because the likelihood of you ever having to do that in real life is so slim, you’re much better off spending the time learning about how to interact with type as it is NOW, not as it was THEN.
Oh, and I’ve never drawn a perfect 0.75p high line with a Rapidograph either. But, I know what Picas AND Rapidographs are.
Kenneth, newspapers are where Christian and I cut our teeth – it can be a grueling.
Christian, you missed the point completely. Please go re-read what I wrote.
I understand your point about appreciating the craft, but just because you use different tools, it doesn’t necessarily make you less of a craftsman.
I didn’t say that at all, nor was I trying to draw that conclusion. I like having our new tools, but go ask someone just out of school how to kern. Is it too much to ask for that attention to detail anymore? Whether you are kerning on a computer or not, that’s craftsmanship, and yeah, I feel old when trying to explain the process to a younger designer who should have spent more time learning the principles of design rather than new “cutting edge” software.
Since we are even having this discussion on a dynamic website that stores all this information in seperate database that I installed, I think it is pretty damn safe to say that I am a technophile. But like the last paragraph in that Rivendell article said:
It’s not inconsistent to use a computer and wear a hand-knit wool sweater, or to pay your bills online yet ride a handbuilt bicycle. You can have a little of everything. Use cutting edge technology to finish tedious or repetitive jobs fast. That way, you’ll have more time to ride your lugged steel bike.
You can also browse through the Parlor archives.
Keep up to date with my email newsletter. Newsletters are sent at least quarterly.
Stay up to date with my Feed in your favorite newsreader!
Check out who is linking to me with my Technorati Profile.
Aug 19, 10:17 AM
I’ve never drawn a .075 pica line with a Rapidiograph, but I know what a pica is! Besides, I slogged through hell at that newspaper and earned my stripes, goddamnit!